If the film hasn't been released yet, how did they get the ant footage that they showed repeatedly?
If anyone has seen the premiere, is the ant shot a legitimate shot from the film?
Also, do they honestly think that this theta dissemination is going to be anything other than advertising for the film?
If the film hasn't been released yet, how did they get the ant footage that they showed repeatedly?
If anyone has seen the premiere, is the ant shot a legitimate shot from the film?
Also, do they honestly think that this theta dissemination is going to be anything other than advertising for the film?
LOL. The COS is dissing Frank Gibney (Alex's dad)?!! Once again the COS is proving that if they are speaking, they are lying and stupid. Frank was a fabulous writer and well respected in academic circles. Read his insights into modern Japan where he spent a great deal of time. Just wonderful stuff. He supervised the first Chinese edition of the Encylopedia Brittanica. (working for Mao, no doubt!)
Frank was a terrific writer and a great researcher who had a great deal of access--exactly the type of person you shouldn't publicly criticize in a offhanded manner. It's like going after Walter Cronkite or Roy Rogers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/14/u...5e5e5ccf5&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&_r=0
This is the type of stupid Scientology does. Hubbard created an organization that made enemies from folks who would have been happy to ignore him or be neutral. Now the COS has more enemies.
Read Frank's Japan's books they're great.
The film Scientology really doesn't want you to watch: Sect lashes out at documentary in rare public video claiming director's father published CIA propaganda
Church of Scientology has launched a full-scale assault on director Alex Gibney's documentary, 'Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief'
In more than 200 tweets, it has tried to discredit the documentary, which premiered to packed audience at Sundance Film Festival on January 25
Claims film is 'propaganda', 'one-sided' and features 'vengeful' sources
It has also released video in which it refers to Gibney's late father, Frank
Says the noted journalist - who died in 2006 - published CIA propaganda
Also accuses Gibney of 'staging scenes' and telling lies in documentary
Film is based on Lawrence Wright's award-winning book of same name
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-published-CIA-propaganda.html#ixzz3To6nKzlf
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
lolKeep on doing the handling tech DM. You are doing our black pr job against you for us....and your stats are straight up and vertical!!
Well, actually that's our stats. Your stats are straight down and vertical. LOL!!!
Finding out that Alex's father did work for the CIA* won't really have an impact on the "wog world". But it will help DM convince the still-ins, and particularly the whales, that this film is all Black PR lies. All they have to hear are "FBI, CIA, or Psychs" and the koolaide is spiked.
*Of course his Dad may not have worked for the CIA at all. I'll need to see real dox.
LOL. The COS is dissing Frank Gibney (Alex's dad)?!! Once again the COS is proving that if they are speaking, they are lying and stupid. Frank was a fabulous writer and well respected in academic circles. Read his insights into modern Japan where he spent a great deal of time. Just wonderful stuff. He supervised the first Chinese edition of the Encylopedia Brittanica. (working for Mao, no doubt!)
[snip]
.
Bang. I don't know how often they mentioned "prison camp", but it was often... Which means everybody who has already heard rumors, or glimpsed stuff on the internet, will probably take this as an incentive to read on the internet... and/or watch the movie...
When do Scientologists get to watch this video (e.g. the original version)? Is it shown to them particularly if they have voiced doubts (as has been told to me about another video)? Or do they get mass emails with a link to these, like to fluffy promos? Or does everybody in an org get to watch it, say, between study or while waiting? Anybody know more about this? :confused2:
One thing I really wonder about... If they put up videos on youtube, and if they do that because they want Scientologists to watch them (rather than other people ... like it has been with the Super Bowl ad) - their channel site is one thing, but while watching a video, on the right side, there are always displayed recommended videos. Youtube sorts them for you, partially based on whatever you have watched lately (in other words, currently I get Mae West, Karen, chipmunks, and cute owls ... ), and partially based on same/related search terms. In the case of Scientology promo, there are always lots of other videos about Scientology, but not from them... Very, very much entheta...
Or has the original version been hosted on their own sites?