Dulloldfart
Squirrel Extraordinaire
Don't forget the thanks to Ron, asagai.
Paul
Paul
I thought Hubbard ripped off study tech from the research of Charles Berner. Alan posted about that a couple of times. Hubbard didn't credit Berner for the work and in fact got rid of him soon afterwards.
Are you suggesting Berner's years of research were to this same end?
Paul
My wordclearing made people brighter for real, and brought about an understanding unique for that person, and not what could have been intended.
.
Don't forget the thanks to Ron, asagai.
Paul
I have no problems with that. Keep at it.
There has been no data on the internet that I know of where
abuse has been done by FZers. You know some?
Where in the cult is there a place for someone who DOES get the words, but disagrees?
1000!
I win! I win!
Dont know--I have to research the guy.
All I meant was that study tech via Hubbard was developed for non study reasons .... it qas another cult tool. Intention is everything. My understanding is that most of Hubbards tech was stolen from other sources anyway.
Dammit!! Dammit!!!!
God--DAMMITT!!!!
Dammit!! Dammit!!!!
God--DAMMITT!!!!
Note to Moderators: I count exactly 10 posts that need to be censored, completely whacked, from this thread.
alanzo, this your first time not being on top?
Pixie, you were replying to a poster called "Reasonable Lady". That is not me...I (Ladybird) am not "reasonable" about criminal cults hiding behind front groups, and I totally agree with you..."if one is applying $cientology 'tech', no matter what one cares to call it, it's $cientology."
1000!
I win! I win!
I don't give a crap about that 1000'th post! - I don't CARE!! YEA HEAAAAAR!!! - I am TOTALLY indifferent! - I think it's not even important! OK!??!!!
I'll just ignore that and continue talking about study tech!! - So there!!
1000!
I win! I win!