He's well-spoken and polite and makes some good points, but he believes in the concept of guilt by reason of race. He mentions ancestry, but that's completely false. The majority of white folks in America do not have ancestors who were ever slave owners or traders, anyway. So guilt by race or assumed ancestry? Guilt by genetics? WTF?
But its worse than that.
He says, "If she's not functioning right, you are the offspring of that, which means in a matter of time, when you find yourself in a similar circumstance or place, you are likely to perpetrate the same heinous acts that put her in any condition that could qualify as sickness or illness." (starts at about 16:00)
Talk about racist, broad, all-encompassing, false, dangerously bigoted statements. Wow.
It was a late 19th century belief that genes were responsible for criminality. At the time, they believed criminals could be identified by their physiological features.
It was a gruesome concept. Acts of sterilization took place to rid society of "criminals, idiots, imbeciles and rapists."
http://www.personalityresearch.org/papers/jones.html
And this same gruesome idea has been repeated over and over in history, whether in Bosnia, Germany, between the Irish and English, or between African tribes themselves: the concept of genetic superiority or inferiority, genetic predisposition to crime, the elimination of those considered inferior by heritage or the concept of descendants of anyone who looks similar to carry a genetic or racial predisposition for crime because someone in the far past with similar white or black skin or big noses or short stature, etc. etc. committed a crime.
This type of thinking is the basis of genocide, of racism, of war. It fosters hatred and separation, not understanding, cooperation and acceptance.