screamer2
Idiot Bastardson
Windowpane will facilitate time warpage.Yes, but mainly in a time-warp.
Windowpane will facilitate time warpage.Yes, but mainly in a time-warp.
You mean bums loitering on the street?I haven't seen windowpane for decades
If you're anywhere near the haight-ashbury stop by and I can hook you up
Other than that, just look for people with gray hair wearing tie-dye t-shirts; most of them can set you up so long as they are confident you aren't trying to set them up
We're not hard to find.
We are EVERYWHERE!
The best place to read "Science of Survival" is sitting in the center of an unknown number of angels dancing on a pin.Hi!!!
I'm an auditor from the early seventies and I wish I could in good conscience give enthusiastic recommendation to the stuy of auditing in a CLV org...
But I can't
But if you want to study auditing and Hubbard's work you should pair up ("twin") with someone and do the Academy levels 0-IV at an "outer org"
Do not go to Clearwater and if you have never used LSD I suggest you sample a small dose (50-80 micrograms) to innoculate yourself against Sea Org recruiters.
Whatever you do or don't do I very highly recommend the book "Science of Survival". It has some flaws and Veda will be happy to tell you of it's worst but flaws notwithstanding I consider it to be nothing less than the finest basic handbook of human psychology ever written.
Also...
Take the HQS course. One of the best bargains on the planet IF studied well...
Hubbard invented a so-called "science," but how did he himself end up?I would appreciate any advice on how to educate myself without the expenses
Hubbard's many physiological and psychological illnesses should not be an excuse for haters to claim that the technology did not work.. . .
Additional (medical doctor's) opinion about
Hubbard's dementia or senility in his final years
There's a video in this posting: Bill Franks Interview
Highlight: from 1:03:30 to 1:08:30, Bill Franks talks about a visit to Hubbard's doctor,
Gene Denk, and the doctor reveals that Hubbard is suffering from dementia, getting
worse and is highly paranoid. Asks if Bill could help out in any way.
Hubbard is very clear and OT, so he claims.
Not what I was expecting to find out when I was a young and naive believer.
Hubbard's many physiological and psychological illnesses should not be an excuse for haters to claim that the technology did not work.
In fact, Ron was 100% correct when he stated that the 100% workable tech works 100% of the time on 100% of all people--and does not work on 100% of SPs.
Thus, it is logically obvious, that LRH was correct 100% of the time.
That's why the tech is 100% workable technology.It's just unfortunate that 100% of the people who are exposed to LRH's '100% workable tech' eventually turn out to be SP's, isn't it?
Thanks, as far as I'm concerned this is the reason why the people on this board and elsewhere who left Scientology, left it, they realized that they didn't have OW's, they realized the truth that they hadn't done anything against Scientology but that Scientology was doing things to them.. . .
Additional (medical doctor's) opinion about
Hubbard's dementia or senility in his final years
There's a video in this posting: Bill Franks Interview
Highlight: from 1:03:30 to 1:08:30, Bill Franks talks about a visit to Hubbard's doctor,
Gene Denk, and the doctor reveals that Hubbard is suffering from dementia, getting
worse and is highly paranoid. Asks if Bill could help out in any way.
Hubbard is very clear and OT, so he claims.
Not what I was expecting to find out when I was a young and naive believer.
Exactly correct. Became painfully obvious finally.. . . but you left when you knew your problems weren't you, but the insane people around you telling you, you were fucked.
Karmic justice always prevails in the case of "raw meat", "newbies" and "wogs" investing their time and money in Hubbard's hoax.......
Better to accept that this newbie considers that Scientology has something to offer, and gently take it from there.
I hope he read the link I gave him but, it seems, we might have lost him.
I hope Clay Pigeon's foolishness didn't send him into the arms of his local "Org."
Time will tell.
"Imagine buying something on eBay or any other website where 99% of the customer reviews are horribly negative and decry the fraud and criminality of the seller who never "delivered what they promised". "Karmic justice always prevails in the case of "raw meat", "newbies" and "wogs" investing their time and money in Hubbard's hoax.
To wit, a person curious about Scientology will always suffer to the exact and precise degree that their destructive act (e.g. evil, crime, overt, et al) is the abnegation and/or derogation of duty to perform due diligence on "Dr." Hubbard's "scientific" miracles.
In modern times (2018) anyone who enrolls in the cult without looking a little bit into Scientology's "customer reviews" (i.e. any of the many hundreds thousands of websites, posts, discussion boards, whistleblowing links, television exposes, articles, books, videos, interviews, documentaries, films, et al) dooms themselves to all of just rewards of naivety, gullibility & stupidity. That is how life works in all domains, person, business or otherwise.
For example, in the financial world, anyone "investing" their hard-earned money into a wildly speculative, unsupported, high-risk investment deserves to lose it, as 99% of said persons invariably do. Further, an "investor" who bleeds their life's savings into a "high-yield" Ponzi scheme will lose it all because they were unwilling to perform a tiny bit of due diligence that probably could have been done (by themselves or a professional financial advisor) in less than 30 minutes.
An "investor" who puts their assets at risk in high-flying, "miraculous" returns-promising ventures is not really an investor any more than someone shoving all their money into the hands of dealers and croupiers at the gaming tables in Las Vegas.
Yet, people still do commit KSW kamikaze these days when all the former customers of Scientology are only 10 seconds away with an internet search.
Imagine buying something on eBay or any other website where 99% of the customer reviews are horribly negative and decry the fraud and criminality of the seller who never "delivered what they promised".
There are always some who will look at those customer reviews on eBay (or right here on ESMB) and choose to ignore them because they have "knowingness" that is senior to facts. Their "feelings" tell them that they know best and that all the others who lost millions of dollars and decades of their life to the cult were not as smart/amazing as themselves; and thus, they arrogantly plunge in and splurge on the masochism of being a Scientologist. LOL.
CONCLUSION: If a person out on a nature hike sees a sign that reads "CAUTION! QUICKSAND!" and still decides to wade through it, karma will perform its duty to use such willful ignorance as a showcase to help others realize that the warning sign was not a joke.
Incredible writing. All of it.Karmic justice always prevails in the case of "raw meat", "newbies" and "wogs" investing their time and money in Hubbard's hoax. < snip for brevity >
Except at ESMB, only because there is always the chance that the opening post is an OSA fictional piece. That in and of itself speaks volumes of where chasing "The Knowledge of Hubbard" can lead you to. If you want to learn about yourself, learn it from yourself.Karmic justice always prevails in the case of "raw meat", "newbies" and "wogs" investing their time and money in Hubbard's hoax.
To wit, a person curious about Scientology will always suffer to the exact and precise degree that their destructive act (e.g. evil, crime, overt, et al) is the abnegation and/or derogation of duty to perform due diligence on "Dr." Hubbard's "scientific" miracles.
In modern times (2018) anyone who enrolls in the cult without looking a little bit into Scientology's "customer reviews" (i.e. any of the many hundreds thousands of websites, posts, discussion boards, whistleblowing links, television exposes, articles, books, videos, interviews, documentaries, films, et al) dooms themselves to all of just rewards of naivety, gullibility & stupidity. That is how life works in all domains, person, business or otherwise.
For example, in the financial world, anyone "investing" their hard-earned money into a wildly speculative, unsupported, high-risk investment deserves to lose it, as 99% of said persons invariably do. Further, an "investor" who bleeds their life's savings into a "high-yield" Ponzi scheme will lose it all because they were unwilling to perform a tiny bit of due diligence that probably could have been done (by themselves or a professional financial advisor) in less than 30 minutes.
An "investor" who puts their assets at risk in high-flying, "miraculous" returns-promising ventures is not really an investor any more than someone shoving all their money into the hands of dealers and croupiers at the gaming tables in Las Vegas.
Yet, people still do commit KSW kamikaze these days when all the former customers of Scientology are only 10 seconds away with an internet search.
Imagine buying something on eBay or any other website where 99% of the customer reviews are horribly negative and decry the fraud and criminality of the seller who never "delivered what they promised".
There are always some who will look at those customer reviews on eBay (or right here on ESMB) and choose to ignore them because they have "knowingness" that is senior to facts. Their "feelings" tell them that they know best and that all the others who lost millions of dollars and decades of their life to the cult were not as smart/amazing as themselves; and thus, they arrogantly plunge in and splurge on the masochism of being a Scientologist. LOL.
CONCLUSION: If a person out on a nature hike sees a sign that reads "CAUTION! QUICKSAND!" and still decides to wade through it, karma will perform its duty to use such willful ignorance as a showcase to help others realize that the warning sign was not a joke.
I may have confessed to the occaisional use of crack but I certainly have not ever recommended it nor have I promoted the use of methamphetamine; both substances whose abuse can be lethal.You mean bums loitering on the street?
Yes, they are everywhere in places such as San Francisco and are destroying the city.
A person with a curiosity about Scientology, and an interest in doing Scientology, while seeking information on how to do so inexpensively, comes here and posts once.
Your response, among other things, is to promote the use of LSD. (Now, three times, in three separate posts, so far, on this thread).
At other times, you've promoted the use of crack and methamphetamine.
If I didn't know better, I'd think you were working for the Scientology cult to create the idea that people, who have experienced Scientology but have moved beyond it, are a bunch of drug abusing lowlifes.
Perplexed.
Faggots got to scream to you know.I may have confessed to the occaisional use of crack but I certainly have not ever recommended it nor have I promoted the use of methamphetamine; both substances whose abuse can be lethal.
I am quite reticent to speak of the very substantial benefit I have derived from LSD and any time I've mentioned it on this board I've been careful to point out it is a radical experience which in many, perhaps most cases changes a person in perpetuity and have always recommended AGAINST it's use.
However...
LSD is less dangerous than a Sea Org contract so I am willing to suggest it as a precursor to the study.
And Veda...
My fellow ESMBer of whom i have respect and affection...
Your parting sentence is so egregious, outrageous, abusive; so warped and distorted it might make a casual reader suspect you of being a homosexual of the screaming faggot variety...
LOL!!!Faggots got to scream to you know.