But think of the benefits, Tansy. If you came back as a chick, you would never have to go far to find a female arse to admire.
Paul
True, but I might be plagued with the "Does my bum look big in this?" syndrome.
But think of the benefits, Tansy. If you came back as a chick, you would never have to go far to find a female arse to admire.
Paul
Isn't that an abdication of responsibility?
I see the wisdom in "living in the moment" but one needs to plan and work for a future - or does one?
If one is totally in present time and minding one's karma, the future will take care of itself.
.
If one is totally in present time and minding one's karma, the future will take care of itself.
.
Karma is a load of bollocks. All it is is the guy withdrawing from an area he won't confront or take responsibility for and so he sets it up as an area to be the effect of and so then (since all of your postulates always work 100% of the time) he goes the effect of it.
Ooooohhh my poor bad karma.......I'll have to suffer as an untouchable for 22 lifetimes, oooohhhhh.
Besides, you simply cannot possibly both "be in present time" and "mind your karma" at the same time.
Show me how that's done! 'Tis an oxymoron.
Unless he does actually know all the postulates that underlay the physical universe, in which case, he'd be at cause over both. This would be ideal, and to me represents victory in the "Theta-MEST War". This is why I consider it very important to get a complete inventory of how the neurological system works as a substrate, as well as isolating how the physical universe functions (physics). If these things are known, someone who was planning their course could completely determine it, except for the other beings present. Like being an expert at anything, one ceases being the effect of the mechanics of the game, and starts being an architect of how to use those mechanics to win a game. (Belichick/Patriots, for example)I have often wondered about what happens to a rational person after death.
He is back to square one in more than one ways. He has to start organizing his postulates all over again.
MEST universe is an already mega-organized bundle of postulates. If he agrees to it as the basis of his organization, then he is way ahead in his game. The only downside is that he doesn't know what he is really agreeing to. To that degree he is at effect from the start.
So, after dying, a rational person has to choose between, starting from scratch and being at cause; or starting from the MEST universe and being at effect.
.
Parents never think about the fact they they themselves are a burden on children.
If one is totally in present time and minding one's karma, the future will take care of itself.
.
I have often wondered about what happens to a rational person after death.
.
It's the pits, isn't it? You spend 18 years teaching them how to be parents, and by the time they've got it right, you move out of home!
I consider myself rational. I can tell you what happened after my last death.
My last death was a bit engramic, and I was out of it but not out of it at the same time.
...
And what happens to a rational person who has built up allegiences is that the positive magic steps in to handle things while you pull yourself back together.
Just my take.
T.I.
Alan, I believe, refers to them as "spiritual team mates". To me, it makes sense that if such things exist, the law of affinity would mean you'd attract those that were close to your tone level, and those that weren't would be repelled. It makes sense to me that as your tone rose, therefor, you'd attract "team mates" rather than "opposition", or whatever. Of course, for me, it's entirely speculative, as I've never met a BT, or a "spiritual team-mate". I have, however, met a whole heck of a lot of very cool people.I consider myself rational. I can tell you what happened after my last death.
My last death was a bit engramic, and I was out of it but not out of it at the same time.
It didn't occurr to me until I was on audited nots.
I audited what was there by negative force and then fell into a positive force of influence.
Yes, there are beings that travel with me and even carry me at times that are here by positive influence or pledge or duty or whatever.
They carried me until I could carry myself again.
I know in the subject of Scientology it is taught that "BT'S" are a negative issue that needs to be audited out.
That was really true for me all the way through OT3 onto audited nots.
Then, I fell into a positive influence.
You can call them "BT's" or whatever you want. Though most of them were outside of my body.
They were not anything negative.
They were my bullets.
And what happens to a rational person who has built up allegiences is that the positive magic steps in to handle things while you pull yourself back together.
Just my take.
T.I.
As far as auditing was concerned, I was stuck on objectives (I believe it was over-run), so I don't have the certainty that you do.
I reasonably believe that I was my own grandfather, and that my grandmother and I have "travelled" together for some time.
Can objectives be overrun?
.
We are all born with a terminal disease it's called mortality.I am curious what the others on this board think about death and their take on it.
One of the things that always takes me by surprise is how people take news of a death.
T.I.
They were my bullets.
And what happens to a rational person who has built up allegiences is that the positive magic steps in to handle things while you pull yourself back together.
Just my take.
T.I.
As far as auditing was concerned, I was stuck on objectives (I believe it was over-run), so I don't have the certainty that you do.
I reasonably believe that I was my own grandfather, and that my grandmother and I have "travelled" together for some time.
What do you mean by that?
Reminds me of first policy " Maintain friendly relations......"