What's new

Please please please repost LRH tape

phenomanon

Canyon
Welcome to the Class V111 Course.
I wanted to show it to Spouse, and I cannot fooking locate it.
Today would be a great day to repost it.

TIA
 

Rmack

Van Allen Belt Sunbather
I know that I am using the wrong title for this tape....it was posted about 3/4 days ago, and it is the one in which he says that he never had a 2nd wife, and which shows his horrid teeth.
???
Sorry I am getting so fooking inept.
Can you link to the one I am thinking of?

I'm pretty sure that's shown in 'The Secret Life of L. Ron Hubbard'. Just search for that on YouTube.
 

HelluvaHoax!

Platinum Meritorious Sponsor with bells on
...

The video you are looking for is "SCIENTOLOGY: THE SHRINKING WORLD OF L. RON HUBBARD":

Start around 12:45 which is where he begins setting up the big lie (never had 2nd wife) with a cluster of smaller bold faced lies. And there are numerous (and obvious) physiological "tells" that he is lying if you watch it closely.



[video=youtube;L_w-YWwC1lI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_w-YWwC1lI#t=781[/video]
 

phenomanon

Canyon
...

The video you are looking for is "SCIENTOLOGY: THE SHRINKING WORLD OF L. RON HUBBARD":

Start around 12:45 which is where he begins setting up the big lie (never had 2nd wife) with a cluster of smaller bold faced lies. And there are numerous (and obvious) physiological "tells" that he is lying if you watch it closely.



[video=youtube;L_w-YWwC1lI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_w-YWwC1lI#t=781[/video]

O Helluva, thank you so much.
You'd think that I'd learn that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
Hubby just ain't having any criticism of LRH, or Scn.
It get too hard, sometimes, to not try to get him to see both sides.
I tried this tape, bc I knew that when I said that there was an LRH video that he hadn't seen, he would be all pant pant pant to see it. And he was. And he did.
He said "to what end" ( did I show him that)? I said so that you would see with your own eyes that LRH was a liar. He said" Show me something better" ( meaning the tek). I said "read something other than LRH, and you will find that Dn/Scn is not original to LRH. LRH lied to you. So did the tek"
It doesn't faze him. He is not widely read ( to say the least), so Dn/Scn is the best (and only) "philosophy" that he knows.
well. WTF.
To each his own.
Bummer.
 

Gib

Crusader
O Helluva, thank you so much.
You'd think that I'd learn that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
Hubby just ain't having any criticism of LRH, or Scn.
It get too hard, sometimes, to not try to get him to see both sides.
I tried this tape, bc I knew that when I said that there was an LRH video that he hadn't seen, he would be all pant pant pant to see it. And he was. And he did.
He said "to what end" ( did I show him that)? I said so that you would see with your own eyes that LRH was a liar. He said" Show me something better" ( meaning the tek). I said "read something other than LRH, and you will find that Dn/Scn is not original to LRH. LRH lied to you. So did the tek"
It doesn't faze him. He is not widely read ( to say the least), so Dn/Scn is the best (and only) "philosophy" that he knows.
well. WTF.
To each his own.
Bummer.

Has your Hubby read Dianetics?

If so, I suggest getting him to read this book by Boris Sidis, as I have posted on other treads just recently.

It's an eye opener.

http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?36513-Altered-Importance&p=950544&viewfull=1#post950544

:confused2:

Just trying to help, since I am trying to open others eyes as well that are close to me.
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
O Helluva, thank you so much.
You'd think that I'd learn that you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.
Hubby just ain't having any criticism of LRH, or Scn.
It get too hard, sometimes, to not try to get him to see both sides.
I tried this tape, bc I knew that when I said that there was an LRH video that he hadn't seen, he would be all pant pant pant to see it. And he was. And he did.
He said "to what end" ( did I show him that)? I said so that you would see with your own eyes that LRH was a liar. He said" Show me something better" ( meaning the tek). I said "read something other than LRH, and you will find that Dn/Scn is not original to LRH. LRH lied to you. So did the tek"
It doesn't faze him. He is not widely read ( to say the least), so Dn/Scn is the best (and only) "philosophy" that he knows.
well. WTF.
To each his own.
Bummer.

Hubbard lled about his military record and so did the church. Why not show Hubby these? They opened my eyes and seeing them was a turning point in my 'love' of LRH

Documents of a Lifetime: The uncensored L Ron Hubbard Papers
http://www.spaink.net/cos/LRH-bio/lrhpaper.htm
 

DoneDeal

Patron Meritorious
This is a good video. I really don't know what to suggest as I don't get people out of scn, embarrassed to say. But this one is a real good eye opener.

[video=youtube;KHb0BZyF5Ok]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHb0BZyF5Ok[/video]
 
Sometimes I think they don't want to change - they are afraid. Who would want their stable data in life destroyed? I didn't. I wanted to get back on lines and g-r-a-d-I-e-n-t-l-y I read enough stuff to start breaking apart the Gordian Knot in my brain. My wife read some lie he had written, thought "what else has he lied about?" and threw the baby out with the bathwater, and then ran over it with her car a few times to make sure it was dead.

Mimsey

gordian_knot.jpg
 

Dulloldfart

Squirrel Extraordinaire
Thank you, Paul.
Have you seen Hilda's Art work? I can't link you to her FB page cuz she has me blocked, but you can prolly go there.

Yes, thank you. She likes Jacarandas! I can easily post links if you want me too: her facebook page and an online gallery hosting her work for sale.

Paul
 

AnonyMary

Formerly Fooled - Finally Free
Phenom, another thing I suggest, something for you actually, is to take a look at these 3 short Prezi video demonstrations created by Heidi Macavoy aka AnonLover, which discuss and demonstrate how cognitive dissonance works with scientologists and how to approach it. This is good for anyone trying to talk sense with a scientologist.

Waking Up From Scientology (Part 1)
"Cognitive Dissonance vs. Cognitive Flexibility: Scientology is a closed belief system that exerts an undue influence over the cognitive processes of adherents. Breaking free of coercive persuasion is no easy task and requires changing how you think."
http://prezi.com/cvz4qlmscuzx/waking-up-from-scientology-part-1/

Waking Up From Scientology (Part 2)
Cognitive Dissonance vs. Moral Dissonance & Related Coping Mechanisms for Dealing with Undue Influence. Understanding the different reactions caused by dissonance can be used to help loved ones trapped in the bubble of Scientology to break free.
http://prezi.com/hhuioj5hmqya/waking-up-from-scientology-part-2/

Waking Up From Scientology (Part 3)
How to communicate with Scientologists using active listening techniques & thought-provoking questions to help cult members break free of undue influence by triggering moral dissonance. (This presentation is still a work in progress.)
http://prezi.com/vcy0fu8w1nzu/waking-up-from-scientology-part-3/


You can see Parts 1 & 2 on youtube as well

Waking Up From The Scientology Trance (Part 1)
http://youtu.be/YezRlAAdGWo

Waking Up From The Scientology Trance (Part 2)
http://youtu.be/_1nqSkCkGcw?list=UUWOowB62xToQElT6UF1opTQ


PDF transcripts:

Part 1
http://www.scribd.com/doc/220118372/Waking-Up-From-the-Scientology-Trance-Part-1

Part 2
PDF transcript: http://www.scribd.com/doc/229521361/Waking-Up-From-the-Scientology-Trance-Part-2

Part 3 pending
 

RogerB

Crusader
Phenomenon,

My lovely, here is a link on verification of Hubbs lying about his own tech . . . it is his denigrating of Dianetics as "only used by psychs to implant" . . .

Read his actual statements that have been later edited out of 8-8008.

This link give you actual scans of the earlier editions of 8-8008 showing Hubbs thing . . . this is where Dull Old Fart and I came to the full conclusion that Hubbs was deceitful and a liar and could be safely left off our lines . . .

Link: http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthre...-Book-Editions&p=426230&viewfull=1#post426230

R
 

strativarius

Inveterate gnashnab & snoutband
Came across a vid. on YouTube today that describes itself as an 'Actual Rare Uncut L. Ron Hubbard Interview.'

This video is about the worst example of film editing I've ever seen. I'm assuming it was created to cast Hubbard in a bad light, however it is so badly done that it could only persuade a 'waverer' that the CofS's claims that evidence against it is being falsified has some truth in them. What is even more surprising is that the vid. kicks off with the 'Anonymous' trade-mark Guy Fawkes mask logo. I can't believe that anyone who is sympathetic to Anonymous's cause(s) would produce such a dreadful piece of work or that a real 'hacktivist' hasn't nuked it yet.

I'm assuming it is supposed to be funny. It is simply pathetic and misguided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiF4OpJnP9M
 
Top