ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at


Discussion in 'Mike Rinders Blog' started by RSS Feed, Feb 11, 2019.

View Users: View Users
  1. RSS Feed

    RSS Feed RSS Feeder Bot

    There is a new post up at the Mike Rinder's Blog


    Another in the series of essays about the Tone Scale from our old friend Brian Lambert. “Your authority over words is absolute. You are grandmaster of words and can do with them as you will. You know what they mean to others. You know how their meanings and melodies affect others” “You use the minds of men” […]

    Continue reading...
  2. lotus

    lotus stubborn rebel sheep!

  3. Edwardo

    Edwardo Patron with Honors

    I wasn’t impressed by this essay.

    The definition that Hubbard meant was probably:

    accountable: in a position where people have the right to criticize you or ask you why something happened.

    Brian avoids this definition.

    The state of being accountable was seen by Hubbard as being a lower thing than being fully responsible - which is placed along the top of the chart of attitudes if I remember correctly.

    And that seems fair enough to me.

    Maybe someone pointed this out in the comments on Mike’s blog, but I couldn’t see it amongst the rush to agree wholeheartedly with what seems to me to be a faulty premise.

    God knows there are enough legitimate things to criticize, but this doesn’t seem like one of them.
    ThetanExterior likes this.
  4. ThetanExterior

    ThetanExterior Gold Meritorious Patron

    I think analysing Hubbard's Tone Scale is a waste of time. I don't know why anyone bothers.