ESMB has entered archive mode. All posts and threads that were available to the general public are still readable. The board is still searchable. 

Thank you all for your participation and readership over the last 12 years.

If you want to join in the conversation, please join the new ESMB Redux at


Discussion in 'General Scientology Discussion' started by Tanstaafl, Dec 2, 2007.

  1. Bea Kiddo

    Bea Kiddo Crusader

    Sometimes I wish I were an airhead and could not understand the big words.

    Like times like this.

    taans.... I had no idea...
  2. Pierrot

    Pierrot Patron with Honors

    It better be only an opinion then ... ;-) but please "don't bet your life on this".

    I've seen enough heteros too, most of whom HUGE beings that were royally fucked somewhere on the track. Quite a sad thing to be.

    Men sexually speaking are of no interest to me. I had however some bi-sexual women turning me on and turning me in, for threesomes. Some lesbians too, which were surprisingly for me attracted. I found NO 1.1 there, rather exhilaration, cheerfullness or so, if it comes to plotting it against the tone scale, in and out of the bedroom.

    And while some had personal issues on 2D unhandled, as heteros do too, most were simply completely uninhibited sexually (one wouldn't guess so seeing them in social life, very classical) and wanted some fun and action.

    The above is my opinion which I find true ;-)
  3. Royal Prince Xenu

    Royal Prince Xenu Trust the Psi Corps.

    I've always maintained that if a guy is going to stick it anywhere other than between a female's legs, the what does it matter the gender of the other person?

    If you're gonna get a blow-job (and who can spell "Bill Clinton" boys and girls?), then does it really matter if the mouth belongs to a man or a woman? I think one can safely ask the same question about the "back door".

    Yes, there's a 1.1 queen world out there, but there are also some very lovely people who don't fit lrh's stereotypes at all.

    In this day and age when whole countries are legislating for gay marriage, I think it's come the time to say "Get over it."

    As for it being a non-procreative activity, the world's already overpopulated enough.

    "Having met george bush, I now understand why I've never had the urge to reproduce."
  4. The Oracle

    The Oracle Gold Meritorious Patron

    You cannot whip someone into a viewpoint Alanzo. All the violence in the world will not make it happen. As far as I knew there is no such thing as "right and wrong answers". This forum is not a math quiz or a majority group must think. You can lead people to wider views or different views. But you cannot beat them into your view with force and invalidation. Isn't this "must think" a major line of protest of your own? As soon as you run "must think" on people you are dealing in ancient black magick. Better to have a free thought from someone than one that was enforced.

  5. Alanzo

    Alanzo Bardo Tulpa

    Sorry TI.

    Sick of Scientology arrogance and bigotry.

    I now have a chance to rip it apart.

    Gonna take it.

    Feels good after all those years.
  6. The Oracle

    The Oracle Gold Meritorious Patron

    People should have the freedom to do what they want with who they want as long as it is not enforced. It's nobodies business what goes on in the bedroom with two consenting adults. I don't think it is fair to take advantage of children and animals.

    I'm also sick of people trying to force me to think with what they are doing in their bedroom. I could care less. If you need an audience go recruit someplace else.

    What goes on in my bedroom is far more interesting to me than "others to others" flows.

  7. The Oracle

    The Oracle Gold Meritorious Patron

    The biggest engram in that group called Scientology, is the MUST THINK tossed against the MUST NOT THINK.

    The Scientologists have their own handicaps to work through.

    For every white side of Scientology, there is a black side.

    If you are not a very skilled pirate you can sink very fast.

    The arrogance and bigotry is a handicap in that it prevents people from reaching, and having. Therefore, knowing.

    And in Scientology, you are supposed to know how to know right?

    If you don't establish your own think then everything else beyond that is borrowed, synthetic, and very fragile. Including the arrogance that comes with the "know".

    But there is even a remedy for that. False data stripping!

    It's a game. That's all. It's just another game. And in the game there is white magick and black magic.

    The key to winning is free thought and true knowledge. You have to sort through the motion and think for yourself.

    But thinking for yourself is key.

    And, once you are in the game, the only way out is the way through.

    Last edited: Dec 5, 2007
  8. Nec_V20

    Nec_V20 Patron Meritorious

    Bea Kiddo,

    I have a theory.

    It's based on the premise that nobody knows what their own butt looks like, so when they are out and about they cast around looking for a butt that they would like their own to look like.

    If the objective reality of the physique doesn't match up to the subjective reality then of course the attire MUST be to blame.

    My wife used to have a friend like that, and although she was really sweet in every other way, she nearly drove us mad with her incessant, "Do you really think I look OK in this?"
  9. Royal Prince Xenu

    Royal Prince Xenu Trust the Psi Corps.

    Don't you know that has been banned? You must think what you are told to think. The thought-police are on their way. :grouch:
  10. The Oracle

    The Oracle Gold Meritorious Patron

    Well, anyway, while we are on this comm ev about what others do in their bedrooms, my friend that I mentioned earlier, the Indian, was a writer. A very good writer as far as I am concerned. And he wrote a book about sexuality which is very interesting for those of you that are still curious:

    And this one he wrote is interesting as well:

    There's also his documentary collection:

    I could go on and on........

    See Jamake? You still have a place in our world.

    Last edited: Dec 5, 2007
  11. Nec_V20

    Nec_V20 Patron Meritorious

    Bea Kiddo,

    there again whether the ass looks big in a dress all depends on whether one is like Rudy Giuliani taking lessons in the art of the "wide stance" from Larry Craig.


    Now there's an image that makes you want to scrub out the insides of your eyeballs with steel wool.
  12. Bea Kiddo

    Bea Kiddo Crusader

    Thanks Nec (though Taansy was asking about the ass looks big in this outfit question)!!!

    Things making sense now!!
  13. Nec_V20

    Nec_V20 Patron Meritorious

    Larry Craig's cat says:

  14. The Oracle

    The Oracle Gold Meritorious Patron

    You are so damned clever.

  15. gomorrhan

    gomorrhan Gold Meritorious Patron

    This is stupid.

    Some fool carried this same thread full of vituperation against perfectly good people on at the Freezone.Org list. Homosexuality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality: none are a comment on case state. Discrimination based on this is for those who are too stupid to realize that they are simply charged up about it themselves.

    Get out there and bang your gong, people, any way you like, and if fools have a problem with it, they can fuck off.

    I do think it's good for people to discuss their views about this, and for it to be known how venomously the Church acts with regard to homosexuals based on Hubbard's biases and their own.
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2007
  16. Royal Prince Xenu

    Royal Prince Xenu Trust the Psi Corps.

    I would have worded that a little more delicately, but it was well put.

    The question does arise, given that thetans may or may not have occupied alternate sex bodies, as to whether this influences sexuality or should it be solely a function of the body's endocrine system?
  17. gomorrhan

    gomorrhan Gold Meritorious Patron

    That's entirely theoretical. I believe there is a genetic component to sexuality, but I don't believe there is no feedback with nature. Experiments have shown that in high-density populations, homosexuality increases. It could be that homosexuality is a response to overcrowding. As such, it's very "survival". In other words, I don't think sexual identity is determined at birth, but I do think it has a genetic trigger. I also think a person can choose to be homosexual. This isn't just a simple decision, but more a willingness to explore the identity, or the behavior. Personally, I believe we're all inherently bisexual, but culturally conditioned to be heterosexual, while environmentally/genetically triggered towards homosexuality dependent on population density.

    In the end, it's whether or not you agree with someone making your genitals hum, and not a psychological disease.

    It's not one or the other, brother.
  18. Royal Prince Xenu

    Royal Prince Xenu Trust the Psi Corps.

    Outside of Scn circles, it has been my theory that homosexuality is nature's way of winding back the reproductive clock. You hit the nail right on the head.
  19. RolandRB

    RolandRB Rest in Peace

    Shirt-lifters should be shot. They are too low on the Tone Scale.
  20. Tanstaafl

    Tanstaafl Crusader

    I don't pretend to know when you're being serious Roland.

    One thing is for sure - they're not as strong as shoplifters. :D