mate
Patron Meritorious
Hi Vinaire.
I am astonished that you ascribe to Darwin's evolutionary nonsense. There is no "survival of the fittest", it is "survival through cooperation". But that is another story. Birds and animals are not a lower order, they're spiritual beings are here too in the physical world to learn something, just as we are. Their ability to share thoughts, is a skill that most of us have lost. As a result mankind had to develop a primitive artificial appliance, the telephone, to compensate.
So you want some "human" examples. Okay then you have my realisation that the birds were thought sharing, that they all got the thought simultaneously, that there was no "sending" of a thought from one to the others. Then you have Siddhartha Gautama and his awareness of the state of self realisation and subsequently he developed vipassana to achieve it. Then recently there was A. Garrett Lisi with his Simple Theory of Everything.
While it is probably true that in most cases, they were reflecting on the subject at hand, the realisation itself was not a conclusion of their deliberations but a sudden thought like a bolt out of the blue. Many would call it inspiration.
Vinaire, I'm not sure where you are coming from, in all of this. I sense that you are in some way, holding onto your reality by ignoring the concepts I am presenting, by viewing my presentation in great detail rather than grasping the concepts I am presenting. You certainly don't have to accept them. But it is time for you to reflect on your own past experiences of having an inspirational thought. That is the only way that you are going to get an experiential understanding of the phenomenon, continuing to ask questions isn't going to do it.
Regards, David.
I am astonished that you ascribe to Darwin's evolutionary nonsense. There is no "survival of the fittest", it is "survival through cooperation". But that is another story. Birds and animals are not a lower order, they're spiritual beings are here too in the physical world to learn something, just as we are. Their ability to share thoughts, is a skill that most of us have lost. As a result mankind had to develop a primitive artificial appliance, the telephone, to compensate.
So you want some "human" examples. Okay then you have my realisation that the birds were thought sharing, that they all got the thought simultaneously, that there was no "sending" of a thought from one to the others. Then you have Siddhartha Gautama and his awareness of the state of self realisation and subsequently he developed vipassana to achieve it. Then recently there was A. Garrett Lisi with his Simple Theory of Everything.
While it is probably true that in most cases, they were reflecting on the subject at hand, the realisation itself was not a conclusion of their deliberations but a sudden thought like a bolt out of the blue. Many would call it inspiration.
Vinaire, I'm not sure where you are coming from, in all of this. I sense that you are in some way, holding onto your reality by ignoring the concepts I am presenting, by viewing my presentation in great detail rather than grasping the concepts I am presenting. You certainly don't have to accept them. But it is time for you to reflect on your own past experiences of having an inspirational thought. That is the only way that you are going to get an experiential understanding of the phenomenon, continuing to ask questions isn't going to do it.
Regards, David.
Hi David,
What we are looking in birds and animals is a lower aspect of evolution and not higher. It is hard wiring of a structure and not some super thinking process. We have a wonderful hard wiring in our body. Interactions among birds in a flock should be compared to interactions between various parts of a human body.
Now have you observed mental telepathy between one flock of birds and another flock of birds? If you have then I would like to know about it.
So, let me rephrase my question that I put to you in my last post:
Could you please expand upon the nature of what becomes suddenly known among humans with some examples.
Sincerely, Vinaire