On that issue, she came across as reasonable and un-clamish to me. :confused2:
And why, oh why, do you inject a derogatory label like "the clam"?
Regards, Panda "the wog" Termint
On that issue, she came across as reasonable and un-clamish to me. :confused2:
I agree with you. Jenna's comments are in line with the opinions of alot of parents in California.
https://www.facebook.com/jennaelfman/posts/10153268219813570
On that issue, she came across as reasonable and un-clamish to me. :confused2:
And why, oh why, do you inject a derogatory label like "the clam"?
Regards, Panda "the wog" Termint
And that word was "cult-loving", wasn't it, Lonestar?
Sorry Panda - you might actually want to listen to what this driveler actually says. The only "reasonable" part was the statement that she's a mother.
She mentions that there are "several" supreme court decisions that uphold that the parents rights are "sacred". Doesn't actually cite any - because the truth is 180 degrees the other way - the rights of the child to medical treatment despite the parents' wishes has been established law for a long time as many Christian Science and JWs have found out.
A reason to oppose the bill is that poor people who have to work may not have the time or money to have their child fully vaccinated and this bill would stop that child from being educated?
Well that's fecking brilliant! - let the child get sick!! What a smart solution that is. So for Jenna the simple solution is to let the poor get infected with preventable disease. Have to say that this is a definition of "reasonable" that never occurred to me. Typical bone head comment from a fecking airhead who does not know what the words "public health" actually mean and entail.
And of course the cultish attack line about how its all about putting money in certain senators pockets.
Reasonable? Hardly.
A reason to oppose the bill is that poor people who have to work may not have the time or money to have their child fully vaccinated and this bill would stop that child from being educated?
Well that's fecking brilliant! - let the child get sick!! What a smart solution that is. So for Jenna the simple solution is to let the poor get infected with preventable disease. Have to say that this is a definition of "reasonable" that never occurred to me. Typical bone head comment from a fecking airhead who does not know what the words "public health" actually mean and entail.
Several diseases are making a big comeback because too many parents are no longer vaccinating their kids. Whooping cough being one of them. Which is deadly.
Where I live, if my kid doesn't have a proper set of vaccination records, the school will not permit attendance, period, end of story. As far as being too poor, wasn't Obamacare and Medicaid supposed to address that.
Back when I was a kid, I remember we had mass TB vaccinations of all incoming kindergartners in the school gym. Perhaps the school nurse can give the vaccination. The school nurses currently can send girls off to have abortions without parental consent or knowledge, so why not vaccinations? If not by the nurse, then by a doctor making the rounds of all the schools.
This year 90.4% of the 535,332 students enrolled in reporting kindergartens received all required immunizations (4+ DTP, 3+ Polio, 2+ MMR, 3+ Hep B, and 1+ Var or physician-documented varicella disease), a 0.2% increase from last year. In addition, the percentage of conditional entrants increased by 0.4% from last year. The percentage of students with permanent medical exemptions(PMEs) stayed the same at 0.19%. There was also a 0.61% decrease in students with PBEs compared with last year. Immunization coverage remained above 92% for each vaccine for all schools since last year.
Community Immunity ("Herd Immunity") Vaccines can prevent outbreaks of disease and save lives. When a critical portion of a community is immunized against a contagious disease, most members of the community are protected against that disease because there is little opportunity for an outbreak.