There is this line from LRH that "To become OT you need to BE OT."
Also, it's his definition of a Sea Org Member ("Sea Org Member is the cause over Matter, Energy, Space, Time and Life") no matter where on "the Bridge" he is.
Thinking over these statements now, i get the idea that following Scientology's Bridge one just goes full circle and ends up with the same himself he started with.
Compare:
"to become a cook you need to BE a cook"
"to become Buddha you need to BE Buddha"
Opinions?
Also, it's his definition of a Sea Org Member ("Sea Org Member is the cause over Matter, Energy, Space, Time and Life") no matter where on "the Bridge" he is.
Thinking over these statements now, i get the idea that following Scientology's Bridge one just goes full circle and ends up with the same himself he started with.
Compare:
"to become a cook you need to BE a cook"
"to become Buddha you need to BE Buddha"
Opinions?