Backwards Planet - Oh, so that's where Scientologists are from!

[guanoloco]

What do you think...is this backwards?

Here's an interesting tidbit from A Piece of Blue Sky:

Hubbard's Sea Org "Medical Officer," Kima Douglas, testified in court that while she attended him from 1975 to 1980, he suffered from arthritis, bursitis and coronary trouble, which Dianetics was also supposed to alleviate. Hubbard wore glasses throughout his adult life, but only in private.

During the Armstrong case, a Hubbard letter to the Veterans Administration, dated April 2, 1958, was produced. Gerald Armstrong had this to say of it:

In my mind there was a conflict between the fact that here he is asking to have his V.A. [Veterans Administration] checks sent to a particular address in 1958, and in all the publications about Mr. Hubbard he had claimed that he had been given a perfect score, perfect mental and physical score by 1950, and by 1947 had completely cured himself, and here he is still drawing a V.A. check for this disability. ... It seems like there is at least a contradiction and possibly an unethical practice on his part.​

During the case, a document was read into the record which clearly shows Hubbard's state of mind during the period when he was supposedly developing his science of mind. It is part of a collection of documents which Armstrong dubbed "The Affirmations," because they are a series of positive suggestions which Hubbard was instilling into himself through self-hypnosis. In "The Affirmations" Hubbard attributed each of his physical difficulties to some evasion on his part. His eyesight was poor because he had wanted to avoid school. His ulcer was an excuse to avoid discipline in the Navy. He admitted that he had never really had any trouble with his hip. He added, however, that through hypnotic command he would be able to convincingly pretend any of these and several other disabilities to obtain a pension, but would return to health an hour after any examination, amused by the stupidity of his examiners. He also commented that his lies would have no effect upon his true condition.

And we have this from page 166 of Science of Survival:

Here is a most interesting fact for the auditor. It may happen with an aberrated child that he has occasionally pretended injury or illness for the sake of accepting sympathy or interest from his parents, guardians, or mentors. The auditor would do well to discover the time in the life of the preclear when he feigned injury or illness knowingly in order to receive sympathy or interest from those about him. In the first place, when an individual will do this he is in fairly bad shape, for this is a form of pretended death. The environment wherein the preclear would do this must have been a highly restimulative environment which had the preclear low on the tone scale. (One should realize that in the course of a lifetime, environ to environ, an individual varies markedly on the tone scale.)

 

[Auditor's Toad]

Aren't these backwards?

HAT DON'T HIT

HEAD ON A PIKE
​

Note on "Head on a Pike": In Flag orders scripture writes that "a thetan has done everything before" so one is not to be reasonable about people making excuses that they have never been trained on it before. One is responsible to "make it go right".

I guess that's why 4 year old children should be terrorized for days in a chain locker.

Now, will the weak knees ones STFU about the sexual ( or any ) abuse of a "child" ?

There is a Flag Order that makes it " OK ".

......And, that IS the truth........................damnit.

 

[guanoloco]

How about a stature-challenged individual like David Miscavige coming up with a slogan like "We Stand Tall"...would that be backwards?

 

[Infinite]

..

 

[GreyLensman]

"A man is as alive as he can communicate" - - LRH

• except to anyone who disagrees with what *we* believe (er..*know*)
  
• except for critical thoughts about Scientology
  
• except if you're in the non-intereference zone
  
• except about your case

AND . . . .

• you must never invalidate a clear or OT
  
• any expressed negative thoughts will get you a trip to ethics
  
• you must not read or post on the Internet, nor read any "entheta" about Scientology . . . in fact here's a computer program to block you from doing so . . .
  
• here is a list of books that you, as a Scientologsit can never read. . . .
  
• here's a list of people you can never talk to --they are suppressive
  
• and if you do communicate about yourself, we'll write it down and have it on hand for blackmail in case you ever decide to leave Scientology. . .

So; in short . . . .you are as alive as you can parrot back words you've studied on course and hypnotically hip-hip and provide long standing ovations at events. . .

"What's true for you is what is true for you..."

...except if it isn't what we said was true. In which case you have MU's and O/Ws. Obviously.

 

[GreyLensman]

http://www.forum.exscn.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=4591&d=1326408709&thumb=1&stc=1

"We are the most ethical beings on the planet."
"Hard Sell - Caring about the person in front of you."
"Credit should be kept available but never used..."
It is just endless.

 

[guanoloco]

Hey, all...I'm wondering if what I'm about to post here might not seem a bit backwards to the rest of you.

Remember stuff like this from Hell Are Hates?

"First consider a group which takes in money but does not deliver anything in exchange. This is called rip-off. It is the 'exchange' condition of robbers, tax men, governments and other criminal elements." - L. Ron Hubbard HCO Policy Letter of 10 September 1982

The infamous wholetrack criminal, Xenu, used "tax audits" to pull in the dupes and wreak his heinous wholetrack crimes.

From Economics - War and Tax 1 March 1969...

One of the ways major Western powers will lose was once explained to me by a friend of mine, a famous US senator.

He said that the drain of “brush wars,” rising taxes and resultant inflation could be maintained for only a few years after which, because of economic collapse, the communists might win after all. That was several years ago—1955.

-

These international bankers are satisfied only with “increased taxes to stabilize the currency.”

One of the Russian objectives is to make a US public rejection of “brush wars” by reason of the resulting oppressive taxation. So it is being accomplished very nicely.

Now you can’t have much faith in any country, be it England or France or the US which taxes its citizens via a dossier-collecting income tax czar. The true ruler of every citizen including those at the top would be that bureau one had to report to or else. When income tax gets up to one collector per taxpayer and interferes with one’s ability to live, and when inflation sweeps away all one’s savings, the population is likely to say that it’s not worth serving, not worth supporting and that any insurgent group would furnish a better government.

-

Income tax is dead against the original US Constitution. Since its adaption in England there have been only depressions.

This “tax” is really a very uneconomical method of collecting money and a serious threat to the individual citizens.

Income tax has been continually used to “get” people against whom no charge could be proven.

It cuts the money off before it can be invested or used in the country.

It denies expansion to commerce and inhibits trade.

If a revolutionary wanted to set a country up to antagonize its citizens, shatter pride in their government and prepare the ground, he would advise putting in income tax and then year by year insist it became more onerous.

...and from Economics April 1966...

INCOME TAX

If you have reservations about the end product of various State acts or the intentions behind them, consider this hitherto hidden fact.

Income tax is designed on the Marxist principle (to be found in Das Kapital, the communist text) of taxation:

“To each according to his need.”

“From each according to his ability to pay.”

About the turn of the century, most Western nations gladly swallowed this potion and wrote income tax laws.

It looks quite innocent.

In a letter written by the Treasury of a great nation, a question as to why income tax was levied so unequally instead of on merely a set percentage of everyone’s gross income was answered with the astounding datum that taxation of one’s net income, and on a sliding scale, was far more humanitarian.

Let us see how “humanitarian” this sliding-scale income tax is.

Inflation is the order of the day. Few Western governments take any but inflationary actions—to wit, to devaluate the buying power of money by spending more money than there is produce to absorb it.

Income tax is arranged so that the more one is paid, the more percentage he is taxed. For a crude example, if one makes 500 monetary units a year, his tax is 2%. If he makes 100,000 monetary units a year, the law is so written that his tax is about 90%. The more one makes, the more one has to pay in proportion.

Very well, let us use this as hours of work. In a low income bracket on a forty-hour week, one pays the government a half-hour’s work a week. In a middle income bracket, one pays the government twenty out of forty hours as tax.

All right, inflation willy-nilly is shoving the lowest worker toward the higher tax bracket.

The price of bread and rent and all will go up proportionate to the value of money. So will his pay. But his tax will increase.

Therefore, governments are very anxious to inflate their money. The more it inflates, the more workers have to be paid but the more percentage the government gets of the work hours.

The end product is, of course, a total state. Industry cannot pay a worker 40,000 monetary units if tax laws take all but 5,000 monetary units.

If you will look at taxation schedules you will see that if a loaf of bread cost ten times its current price and you had other costs rising proportionately, your pay would shrink to where you could not afford to eat because the higher tax percentage would engulf your pay, no matter what it was.

Now, no one has been mentioning this. And governments defend their right to a rising percentage, as income rises with a tenacity that is quite surprising.

There are countless lectures, PLs, HCOBs and such clearly referrencing Elron Elray's position regarding the evils of taxation - Mary Sue factually went to prison over the IRS infiltration and Hubbard himself hid out the remainder of his life on the run from the IRS and indictment.

And now Meade Emory is one of the founding members of the Church of Spiritual Technology...the very same entity that owns all of the Scientology copyrights and trademarks?

Here's a little about Meade...from this link here...

First, Meade Emory was Assistant Commissioner of IRS at the very time when Guardian Office personnel are purported to have been stealing documents from IRS. Meade Emory was Assistant Commissioner of IRS on 11 June 1976 when an IRS employee, Gerald Wolfe--purportedly a GO plant inside IRS--is stopped by FBI agents in an alleged document-stealing run. Meade Emory was Assistant Commissioner of IRS on 30 June 1976 when Gerald Wolfe was arrested by FBI agents at his desk inside the main IRS building at 1111 Constitution Avenue in Washington D.C. Meade Emory was Assistant Commissioner of IRS on 3 September 1976 when IRS employee Gerald Wolfe, incredibly, voluntarily waived protection he had against going before a Grand Jury, which is the only thing that allowed a Grand Jury to go forward in the case.

And this purportedly is what caused, less than a year later, a massive raid on the Guardian Office by FBI agents on both coasts.

And this is what ultimately sent L. Ron Hubbard's wife to jail.

So the question is: Are we all actually supposed to believe that L. Ron Hubbard, who had referred to IRS officials as "tax cruds," then hired former Assistant Commissioner of IRS Meade Emory to be founder of the corporation, CST, that would then own L. Ron Hubbard's intellectual property, and control all of Scientology?

You make the call.

Isn't that just a bit backwards?

 

[guanoloco]

Didn't Hell Wrong write "If it isn't written it isn't true."?

Didn't he also write "The work was free...keep it so."

Isn't that backwards?

 

[guanoloco]

You simply don't seem to appreciate all that Ron has done for you!

When Ron was waging a decades-long one-man crime wave of espionage, break-ins, government infiltration, terrorism, planting false evidence, lying and conspiring to drive people into insanity or suicide-------that was just a pilot.

Ron was researching what does and does not work in order to tape the road to total freedom.

You and I have it easy, now that Ron did all that. We can simply read the tech like "Set a Good Example" and "Do Not Murder" and not have to live in a Bluebird trailer on the run from authorities.

(turns volume up to 11 on "Thank You For Listening" and sips cal mag)

This has got to be one of my top three posts evahhhhhhhh!

I like this one and the WAMM (We Are Marilyn Monroe) and there was another one but I'm so batshit lunatic that I forgot it!

Imagine that...

 

[guanoloco]

How about a stature-challenged individual like David Miscavige coming up with a slogan like "We Stand Tall"...would that be backwards?

...originally posted with this image...

 

[PirateAndBum]

...originally posted with this image...

SP Hall (The Hole) Sing Along? We Stand in Shit