Claire Swazey
Spokeshole, fence sitter
I never thought anyone should be "impressed". And if someone actually condescended like that to me, they'd wind up on my ex friend list.
I'm guessing that during sex L. Ron Hubbard would call out his own name.
The Anabaptist Jacques
So I have this beautiful wog girlfriend who I am very happy with. It's sort of been my policy for a while to not mention my Scientology history to the girls I date. I didn't care when I first got out of the SO, but as Scn's public image gets worse and worse, I've tried to edit that part of my life out. My being here on this forum proves that I cannot fully pretend it never happened, nor do I want to as I have some wonderful memories, and I was lucky enough to not have some of the experiences others here have had (spent most of my SO time off base, so I always had my own room, cooked my own meals, etc.)
She gets calls from Scientology herself from time to time (apparently she bought a book years ago), and I've never told her about my past involvement. My family is, for the most part, equally willing to edit Scientology out of all our lives, and they are aware that I've withheld this information from her.
Part of me wants to be more honest about this (the only real lie I've told her in the last year), but there's another part of me that... It's not that I think she'll leave me or even be weirded out by it, actually she called them Christian Scientologists, proving her unawareness of what the cult actually stands for. But I just am worried that talking about this part of my life will dredge up a lot of emotions, and that I'll have to talk about it more often than I'd like. I'm comfortable with a forum like this because I can be anonymous and just not log on if I'm not into it, be she will certainly have questions. The man I was when I joined the Sea Org and the man I am now are not that different, but to an outside observer, I think they would seem very inconsistent.
Anyway, I was wondering if anybody else has edited Scientology from their life history? Can you offer some insight? Am I kidding myself about this?
You've kinda hit the nail on the head. I'm not worried she'll leave. I'm worried she'll be interested and want to talk about it. I'm worried that this will be a conversation topic in our lives. To me the ideal reaction would be to tell her and have her say "ok" and never speak of it again, but I don't really see that happening.
Just for example. I have a very, very attractive wife. Dated her for years before we got married. We'll celebrate our 21st anniversary this Friday.
Didn't mention Scientology once when we were dating. Didn't matter. Wasn't important. Still isn't. When I talk to her now about it, she's not very interested in that crap. She's got more important stuff to capture her attention.
My best friend, Emily and her friend Karen are fascinated, so we talk about it now and then. All the embarrassment. All the thwarted purposes. All the passions and emotions. For them, it's entertaining. Like hearing stories of getting caught fucking someone in a parking lot by security. Embarrassing, but...
As Sallydance pointed out in a comment I read today, (paraphrase) "Sometimes the truth will set you free; sometimes it will simply fuck you up." My daughter loved the concept.
Like feeling compelled to tell your significant other that you jerked off last night, you might see her shrug and reply, "I don't care. What movie are we going to see tonight? And I want to try that French cafe on the Square."
Some "truths" which we find embarrassing, and which we feel compelled to reveal simply have little or no importance to those we do find important.
Scientology is simply unimportant. It's simply not a deal breaker. Seriously.
Not all truth is important. Not all truth is relevant to all relationships.
What's important is sharing experiences and making a life together.
You might be surprised. I was in the Sea Org for 14 years. I got out over 15 years ago. My husband has never been in. He knows I have. He's never shown any interest in that part of my life at all.
It probably means a whole lot more to you than it will to her.
The frustrating part dude is that in scientology the truth is so important, and you're taught that everyone needs to know everything about everything. Scientologists by nature are nosy, obnoxious know-it-alls because that is what you are taught you are supposed to be. You're taught that the ”truth” and a lie is the difference between life and death. And unless you tell your mom that you took 50 cents from her purse when you were 7 you'll never be free.
In the real world it's much different. Lying is important. Not sharing certain things with people is important. It's a part of every day life to omit and alter things to make yourself and life more palatable to others. Not everyone needs to know that you masturbated last night, or that you experimented with drugs in college. It just doesn't matter.
The only people that need to know the whole truth are your lawyer, your doctor and your therapist. And there is a reason there are laws in place to keep them from sharing your shit with other people.
Yep, what was that scale again, with KNOW on top...you just know things...
Hubbard, poorly plagiarizing from game theory, posited that games couldn't exist without lies and not-knowingness. Then he created an organization whose purpose was to play games with other organizations and governments. He stressed that people in good shape were great players of games, or game-makers, whereas others were merely pawns or broken pieces, who often didn't know they were part of a game.
The ostensible purpose of auditing is to remove charge, lies and not-knowingness from the case. At a certain point, then, a person should become a good player. At that point, Hubbard then wanted them made into HIS player, playing HIS game. From that point forward, all auditing is focused on making people his pawns in a game with a being known as Xenu or other "implanters".
It stops being about becoming more aware and capable, and starts being about indoctrination and control.
Anyone who dares become a source, on their own, of a new game, or that points out the fraud of his game, becomes a "suppressive".
It's pretty simple.
My understanding of the mind control functions of scientology is fairly thorough. That douchenugget named Hubbard was a genius. I wish I knew how he learned all that. His studies in human psychology must have been what he was really doing instead of becoming a nuclear physicist.