Veda
Sponsor
You know, thats what I always assumed was on the OT levels. Thats what used to make me so excited about them. Its quite a loss to hear that the tech to do that DID exist, but he never put it into action on the Bridge. What a shame.
I always wanted to rehab abilities, that was something I thought Id get on the OT levels. You know, if in a past life Id played the guitar, been an exec, done various degrees, built the pyramids, I thought Id get all that info and knowledge back. It was definitely mentioned in various taped lectures that that was possible.
Oh well. Another part of the scam...
While "actual GPM" running seems to have produced mixed results, one result of the several years exploration of actual "GPMs" was the collection of data - of the "patterns of living."
If Hubbard had something else in mind - a "Hidden Agenda" - then, as with any "covert operation" activity, "data collection" would have been the initial step.
(This is not to say that the "actual GPM"-era in Scientology is not an intriguing one, or that the period that led into it [notably, 1958] was not equally interesting, and I still regard that as a high point for the positive aspects of the subject - *but*, even then, the publicized objective of "making OTs" may not have been the primary objective for Hubbard.)
"Actual GPM" work fizzled out, and was replaced with "Implant GPMs," which became "deadly serious" and "vital to your survival" and "confidential," and had to be told to you, in specific and sometimes bizarre detail - by Ron, through his secret materials - and this occurred concurrent with Hubbard's placing into application, in a major way, most of the ideas and practices of his 'Brainwashing manual' (which took several years). Is that a clue?
I've noticed that when Scientologists mention "GPMs," they often don't differentiate between "actual GPMs" and "Implant GPMs." Yet, an "Implant GPM" would be - per Scientology theory - only a type of engram.
Where would - for example - the "goal" of an "actual GPM" be on the "Tone Scale," and where would the "goal" of an "Implant GPM" be on the "Tone Scale" (or other scales?) One would be high and the other low, one would have the being at cause, and the other would have the being at effect.
As a side issue, since 1979, "postulates" have been emphasized in Dianetics, with getting the "postulate off" as a step in R3R procedure. Before that, "postulates" were not directly addressed in R3R, and it seemed unnecessary to do so. Also in 1979, in key Dianetics bulletins, the term "somatic" was changed to "consideration." One was no longer primarily addressing "somatics," but the much airier (think-oriented) "considerations."
Where would a "postulate" that was "made" in Dianetics be on the "Tone Scale"? (Or other scales?), it would be pretty low. Yet, where would a self-determined (non-engramic) postulate be on the same scale?
So, what occurred with "GPMs" in the 1960s, in a way, occurred with "postulates" in the 1970s, and this seems to be part of the over-all down trending of Scientology from what was - IMO - its high point in the mid/late 1950s.
The excuse was - "The 'low' needs to be handled before the 'high' is addressed," yet when is the "high" actually addressed?
Instead, Hubbard (and, subsequently, some others, such as Filbert, L.Kin, Bill Robertson, Ken Ogger) presented scenarios involving galactic political intrigue, entities (sometimes they're even numbered as to type), and Implants, and more Implants. And, while other (more positive) areas are sometimes mentioned, it's as the saying goes, "talk, but no walk."
Where are the results?
Meanwhile the subject of Scientology - for many - remains "un-decoded," while yet more *significance* is piled atop the already existing significance, or - in some cases - more PR is piled atop the already existing PR.
That's one reason why I value the efforts of some in (what is called, on ESMB), the "Independent Field." There, Hubbardian significance is minimal, and appreciation of a possible "hidden agenda" by Scientology's founder is, at least, suspected - and there is a lack of adding to that already existing significance (which can become a kind of fetish), and a refusal to participate in already existing PR, or add to it (and the honesty is appreciated.)